Oct 28, 2024 – First day of visit to Bhutan, arrival in Nabji village
Hello. Today is the day Sunim arrive in Bhutan and travel to Nabji, a remote mountain village in central Bhutan.
He departed from Incheon Airport at 8:35 PM last night, flew for 6 hours and 10 minutes, and arrived at Bangkok Airport at 2:45 AM Korean time, which was 12:45 AM local time.
After retrieving his luggage and before changing planes, Sunim sat in restaurant chairs to proofread manuscripts and handle some work.
At 2 AM, Sunim checked in our luggage and completed boarding procedures to catch the flight to Bhutan.
However, Sunim discovered that the visa validity period and multiple-entry status written by Bhutan’s immigration on his passport had completely disappeared. During the last visit to Bhutan, his bag got wet, including the passport, and somehow only that information had been erased. At Bangkok Airport, they said he couldn’t board the plane until Bhutan’s immigration confirmed the visa. Due to the early morning hour, he couldn’t reach Bhutan’s immigration. As the boarding deadline approached, Bangkok Airport suggested changing our tickets to tomorrow’s 1 PM flight. After much pleading, he was finally able to get our boarding passes by signing a waiver accepting any consequences.
He arrived at the gate just before 4 AM. After a brief nap in the chairs, he departed from Bangkok Airport at 5 AM.
Having stayed up all night due to the check-in issues, Sunim fell into a deep sleep as soon as he sat down on the plane. While he slept soundly, day broke. The snow-capped Himalayan mountains were clearly visible through the window.
Looking down from the sky, Paro in Bhutan had turned into golden fields everywhere.
After flying for 3 hours and 10 minutes, passing through several valleys, the plane landed at Paro Airport at 7:15 AM.
After completing immigration procedures and retrieving our luggage, he exited the airport to find Rinchen Dawa, who will be interpreting during this visit, and Yeshi, a Bhutanese central government official, welcoming Sunim.
After exchanging warm greetings, Sunim departed from Paro Airport at 8:20 AM and began the long journey to Nabji village. He had to travel by car for 10 hours on winding mountain roads.
Sunim crossed over two mountains with an altitude of more than 3,000 meters above sea level.
After driving for 5 hours, Sunim stopped at a restaurant for lunch at 1:10 PM.
After finishing our meal, Sunim diligently continued the journey on mountain roads. As he caught up on sleep and chatted in the car, the sun began to set.
Exactly 25 hours after departing from Incheon Airport at 8:40 PM the previous night, Sunim arrived at the Nabji Chiwog guesthouse at 6:20 PM local time. Kolpu Gewog officials were waiting for Sunim in front of the dimly lit guesthouse.
“Kuzuzangpo la!”
After exchanging warm greetings, Sunim entered the guesthouse. It had been two months since he last met during the JTS workshop in Zhemgang at the end of August.
Today’s accommodation is a guesthouse run by local villagers. In Bhutan, slightly larger houses all have a prayer room set up inside.
After Sunim paid respects at the prayer room, the Tshogpa (village leader) of Nabji Chiwog performed a ceremony praying to Buddha and local deities for the smooth progress of the project.
Then, tea and snacks were served.
A meeting was held for an hour with Sunim, leaders from three villages (Korphug Chiwog, Nabji Chiwog, and Nimshong Chiwog), the Gup and administrative officer of Korphu Gewog, the administrative planning officer of Trongsa Dzongkhag, and a central government official.
Over the past two months, Nabji Chiwog had been working on paving the roads within the village. Sunim first commended the Tshogpa for his hard work.
“Thank you for your hard work on the road construction.”
“It was easier to transport materials compared to when we were working on the water channel project because the roads were better.”
Sunim then explained the plan for tomorrow’s site visit.
“Nabji Chiwog has expressed interest in building farm roads, so we’ll survey how to construct them. As villagers age, they’ll have less strength. Without farm roads, they have to carry manure or harvests on their backs, which is very strenuous. We need to build roads that can accommodate at least power tillers, if not trucks. While JTS can provide the construction costs, villagers will need to contribute small portions of their land for the roads. If residents agree, we should build the farm roads first, then the water channels. We’ll decide tomorrow during the site visit whether to build one road each horizontally and vertically across the fields, multiple roads, or a road circling the entire area if a grid pattern is difficult.
Additionally, there’s a proposal to use some uncultivated land as a demonstration farm run by JTS. We’ll decide tomorrow during the site visit whether it’s better to turn that land into rice paddies or an orchard.”
The Gup (head) of Korphu Gewog explained the discussions he had with residents about how to build the farm roads.
“When I discussed this with the residents, those who would have to give up more of their land opposed building the roads. There’s dissatisfaction because people won’t be contributing land equally.”
Sunim responded:
“Having your land included in the farm road project means it will be adjacent to the road, which is actually beneficial. However, even those whose land isn’t directly included will benefit, so we need to gather all residents and mediate opinions. For example, if person A’s land contributes 100 units to the road, A could bear 50 units, and the other 50 could be shared by those whose land isn’t directly included. This is because the benefits of farm road construction will be enjoyed by all residents.”
The Gup of Korphu Gewog once again explained the residents’ position. Sunim suggested making a decision after talking with the residents tomorrow.
“Residents find it difficult to give up their land because it’s an inheritance from their parents. In the past, when building roads in the village, there were instances where people signed agreements to give up their land, but when the excavators came to dig, they lay down on their land and strongly opposed it. It’s very painful for them to see their land disappear.”
“In that case, we’ll have to wait for 5 or 10 years. It will have to be done eventually, but we’ll have to wait. As people get older and weaker, they’ll have no choice but to introduce machinery, which means farm roads will be necessary.
We might only be able to build farm roads after all the elderly have passed away. While young people are interested in mechanization, the elderly insist on traditional methods.
We need to understand why the elderly are opposed. They created these fields with their own hands, picking out stones and tilling the land. Tomorrow, we’ll listen to the residents’ opinions. If they want farm roads, we’ll build them; if not, we can only construct waterways. To minimize disturbance to farmland, we could build roads around the entire field. I think you suggested this idea to preserve the farmland. (Laughs)
Let’s make a decision after surveying the area tomorrow. Actually, I wasn’t planning to come this time, but the JTS staff kept insisting that I should personally inspect the construction site because you requested farm roads to be built.”
“Kadin Che!” (Thank you.)
After the meeting, he had a late dinner together.
The table was set with Bhutanese food prepared by the Tshogpa of Nabji Chiok and kimchi and pickles made by the Korean JTS activist.
“I will eat with gratitude.”
After the meal, when all the village leaders and officials had returned home, Sunim also went to bed.
Since there was no Dharma talk today, I’ll share a conversation between Sunim and a questioner from the live Dharma Q&A broadcast on the 25th.
Should I Pretend to Be Extroverted to Gain Recognition at Work?
“You’re criticizing others for not recognizing diverse personalities and using a uniform standard for evaluation, aren’t you? Similarly, others could criticize you. There can be various criteria for evaluating people. Their choice to use extroversion as a criterion is their own decision, so why are you arguing about it?“
“It wouldn’t matter if evaluations only affected personal reputation, but they influence performance reviews, which is why it’s concerning. Even when doing the same work, introverted people often receive lower evaluations compared to extroverted individuals because they don’t actively promote their accomplishments. In such cases, it feels unfair to be at a disadvantage despite putting in the same effort.”
“For instance, if selecting track and field athletes, those who run slowly would naturally be criticized by the coach. In baseball, players who throw fast, catch well, or hit well would be highly evaluated. For soccer players, scoring or defensive skills would be the criteria. Singers would be evaluated based on pitch, rhythm, and tone. Thus, each profession requires different competencies, and the criteria for evaluating these competencies vary accordingly.
In your field of work, you’re not undervalued for not running fast or criticized for not receiving or kicking a ball well. Instead, isn’t it that your profession requires you to speak confidently with a loud voice in front of people? Your complaint is like a soccer player asking why they’re only evaluated on their ball-kicking skills, arguing that some people are good at kicking while others aren’t. It’s similar to a runner complaining about being judged by running speed when everyone has different physical abilities. There will inevitably be core competency assessment criteria for each profession. If you’re a track athlete and your speed lags behind other runners, you should switch to a different event. If a soccer player is poor at kicking the ball, they should change careers. The point is not to question the evaluation criteria of the field. The assessment standard in your current profession is extroversion, and you’re evaluated and compensated accordingly. It doesn’t make sense to complain about applying criteria that are unfavorable to you.
Therefore, one option is to move to a profession that doesn’t use extroversion as an evaluation criterion. For instance, if you were farming, you wouldn’t be evaluated based on extroversion. You’d be assessed on how well you transplant rice seedlings or sow crops, not on how loudly or softly you speak. Extroversion should be seen as the evaluation standard for the career path you’ve chosen.”
“After hearing your explanation, Sunim, I now understand that extroversion is the evaluation criterion required in my profession, and to receive a good evaluation, I need to be more proactive in speaking up. However, I find it difficult to accept that even when doing the same work, those who talk more about their achievements and present them well receive better evaluations.”
“If you want a good evaluation, you can do the same. If you don’t want to do that, you can give up on being recognized. Why are you arguing about this? If you want recognition, you can do it that way. It’s the same principle as practicing running if you want to run fast, or practicing kicking if you want to kick a ball well. If good self-expression leads to a good evaluation, you too can express and present your achievements well. If you can’t express yourself as well, you should accept the lower evaluation.”
“It’s because I’m inherently not good at expressing and showcasing myself.”
“Then you can change your profession. You can move to a career where you don’t need to express yourself well. It’s like someone who is naturally not good at singing complaining about being evaluated solely on their voice. If you’ve realized ‘I’m not suited for this profession,’ you can switch to a different one. If you’re in an office job, sales, or public relations, being extroverted is necessary. In the past, self-promotion was sometimes viewed negatively, and even today, some professions may evaluate it poorly. For example, in a practice community like Jungto Society, someone who always exaggerates and promotes themselves would be evaluated negatively. Instead, expressing oneself less than one’s actual ability might be seen as humility and receive a good evaluation. However, in places like companies, there’s a saying ‘It’s the era of self-PR,’ meaning you need to express yourself well so that people can know about you and evaluate you accordingly. If the times demand it, and especially if your profession requires that ability, you should work according to that standard to receive a good performance review. If you can’t do that, you should accept a lower evaluation. So, it’s not appropriate to argue, ‘Why evaluate based on extroversion?'”
“I see, I understand now.”
“Meditating monks might be evaluated on how long they can sit quietly. But monks who spread the dharma are evaluated on how well they speak. In a meditation hall, a monk who speaks well might receive a very low evaluation. In a group focused on spreading the dharma through speech, someone who remains silent and doesn’t speak won’t receive a good evaluation. So, it’s not logical to argue against the evaluation criteria set by that professional group.
However, there are cases like this. If a person who doesn’t speak much is in a dharma-spreading group, it might be a disadvantage at first, and they might not receive proper evaluation. But over time, as people experience that person and trust builds up, many might come to follow them. You’re complaining that the company’s evaluation criteria don’t suit you, while paradoxically hoping that the company will quickly recognize your true value and evaluate you highly. If you don’t want to follow the evaluation criteria, you’ll have to accept some losses for now. However, after some time passes, people might recognize your skills and sincerity and give you a good evaluation. But we can’t know that now.”
“I understand. I’ll try to work according to the company’s evaluation criteria.”
“That’s not what I meant. Since you’ve joined a company with such evaluation criteria, if you want to receive a good evaluation, you should work according to those standards. But if you don’t want to do that, you shouldn’t expect a high evaluation. I’m not saying you should try to meet the evaluation criteria. In our current system, do you need good grades to go to university? Or not?”
“Yes, you need good grades.”
“But if you decide not to go to university, you don’t need to get grades that meet the school’s evaluation criteria, right? The point is, you shouldn’t argue about why people are evaluated by grades if you’ve decided to go to university. I personally oppose ranking students by grades. If I had the authority to make decisions about education, I would eliminate all systems that rank by grades. But I don’t have that authority, and the current education system evaluates by grades, right? In this education system, to receive a good evaluation, you need to take tests and get good scores. If you refuse to be evaluated by test scores, you must accept a lower evaluation.
I don’t mean you should try to be extroverted. I mean that if you want to get a good score under the current evaluation criteria, you need to work according to those criteria, and if you can’t agree with those evaluation criteria, you should accept receiving a lower score. It’s not about which is right, but about choosing one or the other. But right now, you’re being greedy. It’s contradictory to dislike conforming to the evaluation criteria but still want to receive a good evaluation.”
“So you’re saying that if I want to receive a good evaluation, I should work according to the evaluation criteria?”
“Yes, that’s right. If you’re introverted and no matter how hard you try, it doesn’t work well, or if you don’t agree with such evaluation criteria, you should accept getting a lower evaluation score. Instead, you could try to get higher scores in other areas. They don’t evaluate based on just that one thing, right? When I was in school, I got high scores in Korean, English, Math, Social Studies, and Science. But at the end of each semester, they evaluate all subjects. My scores in Music, Physical Education, and Art were nearly failing. When they calculated the average of all subjects, my ranking dropped significantly. But that’s the evaluation method, so there’s nothing we can do about it. Similarly, we can’t ask to be evaluated only on what we’re good at and exclude what we’re not interested in from the evaluation. This is because the world isn’t made up of just people like us, but of various different people living together. Even in sports, there are various events like running, throwing, and even in archery, there are different categories. Some people might be good at one event, others at another, and some might be good at everything comprehensively. There can be various evaluation criteria. If you think the evaluation criteria seem unreasonable, you can accept a lower score, and if you want to receive a high score in the evaluation, you can work according to the evaluation criteria. However, if the evaluation criteria violate the basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, you should raise an issue. For example, if there are elements of human rights violations, racial discrimination, gender discrimination, or infringement on religious freedom, you should file a legal complaint.
I understand your frustration. However, each field and profession has its own evaluation criteria. It’s important to remember that these criteria are specific to that field and do not assess a person’s inherent worth. When evaluating, we should always clarify that we’re using field-specific criteria. These standards should be understood as measuring suitability for a particular job or task, not as a judgment of the person as a whole.”
“Thank you.”
Tomorrow morning, Sunim will visit Nab Ji village and participate in rice harvesting with the residents. In the afternoon, he will meet with officials from Kolpu Gyeok, then travel to Panbang. In the evening, he is scheduled to meet with Governor Jemgang and other Bhutanese government officials.
